Answering The Question Is Web Design Art San Angelo?
Posted by Unknown on 12:00 AM with No comments
Let us face it. People have opinions about tattoos. Discussion boards and forums go nuts with people passionately defending their side of the debate (to the point I had to set up a website about it!). One of the main questions in this war of words... Should tattoos and tattoo blueprints be considered sculpture? The article will lead us through the theme is tattoo Design Art San Angelo or wasted ink?
You might think, yes, of course. But why are people so strongly against it as an sculpture form then? I see a lot of people look at modern sculpture and say "I don't get it" without getting passionate about the question. So what's the difference when it comes to tattoos? Does the fact that the drawings are on a human body have anything to do with it?
They love sculpture that pushes boundaries and breaks the rules and says new and interesting things in new ways. Think about the best-known artists throughout history and what they are known for. They are known for being new and innovative, for going places in sculpture no one has ever been. Picasso was known for his abstraction of the human form, despite the fact he was a master skill level artist of plain realistic reproduction by the time he was 16
To take it to another level, it's as if you looked at a city leveled by war and attacks, saw all of the death and destruction laying before you, and decided you would call it sculpture. You may have the right to call it what you want, but there would be a pretty long line waiting to tell you otherwise. So maybe it has nothing to do with the tattoo designs, then.
Perhaps it all stems from whether or not you think tattoos are harmful towards the body. If it comes to this, the issue is never going to be settled, because people hold different views of what is best for the body. I mean, this subject touches religion as well as hygiene and turns itself into a much longer article. So let's dismiss this point from the discussion and go on...
Where do the lines fall when it comes to tattoos being sculpture? Is getting a tattoo a form of self-expression on a rare and perishable canvas? Should we respect it as "drawing" because it exemplifies a high degree of intention? Or should we be able to shake our heads at the works that, simply put, are ridiculous?
As we all know, painting is always in the eyes of the beholder, but the sculpture of the times' is a different matter. It reflects the current artistic state of society, and it's ever-changing. It's often pointed out how some knack is ahead of its time, and how the public that isn't ready to experience it yet.
But, is that true for tattoos today? Are tattoo designs on the human body an knack form that will come about in time? Or do we not want as a public to accept them? Are they just fads that will never really become drawing? All this are the questions flowing in the mind on many people around the globe.
You might think, yes, of course. But why are people so strongly against it as an sculpture form then? I see a lot of people look at modern sculpture and say "I don't get it" without getting passionate about the question. So what's the difference when it comes to tattoos? Does the fact that the drawings are on a human body have anything to do with it?
They love sculpture that pushes boundaries and breaks the rules and says new and interesting things in new ways. Think about the best-known artists throughout history and what they are known for. They are known for being new and innovative, for going places in sculpture no one has ever been. Picasso was known for his abstraction of the human form, despite the fact he was a master skill level artist of plain realistic reproduction by the time he was 16
To take it to another level, it's as if you looked at a city leveled by war and attacks, saw all of the death and destruction laying before you, and decided you would call it sculpture. You may have the right to call it what you want, but there would be a pretty long line waiting to tell you otherwise. So maybe it has nothing to do with the tattoo designs, then.
Perhaps it all stems from whether or not you think tattoos are harmful towards the body. If it comes to this, the issue is never going to be settled, because people hold different views of what is best for the body. I mean, this subject touches religion as well as hygiene and turns itself into a much longer article. So let's dismiss this point from the discussion and go on...
Where do the lines fall when it comes to tattoos being sculpture? Is getting a tattoo a form of self-expression on a rare and perishable canvas? Should we respect it as "drawing" because it exemplifies a high degree of intention? Or should we be able to shake our heads at the works that, simply put, are ridiculous?
As we all know, painting is always in the eyes of the beholder, but the sculpture of the times' is a different matter. It reflects the current artistic state of society, and it's ever-changing. It's often pointed out how some knack is ahead of its time, and how the public that isn't ready to experience it yet.
But, is that true for tattoos today? Are tattoo designs on the human body an knack form that will come about in time? Or do we not want as a public to accept them? Are they just fads that will never really become drawing? All this are the questions flowing in the mind on many people around the globe.
About the Author:
When you are looking for information about design art San Angelo, come to our web pages today. More details are available at http://www.sdartistries.com/dube-doodles now.
0 التعليقات:
Post a Comment